The results are in. http://www.sorrentohoa.org/2008%20Survey%20Results.pdf
Were you surprised?
Do you think this reflects a consensus of our residents?
Do you agree or disagree with your neighbors?
How do you think the Board should react to any of the topics you and your neighbors responded too?
The verbatim comments are being compiled now. We can discuss those next week after they are all posted.
Pat Pope
President
I Don't Mind Speed Humps Unless They are by My House
So, does a “yes” answer mean:
Yes I don’t mind speed humps unless they are by my house.
Or a “no” answer mean:
No I don’t mind speed humps unless they are by my house.
Now read those two sentences very closely as if they were spoken to you, and explain how the answer is any different? They both seem to imply speed humps are okay as long as they are not by my house. Was this a trick question? And is it not proper to inject a negative into a questions as the application of Yes or No is ambiguous?"
1) The new proposed fobs are supposedly alternating radio frequency. This would make them incompatible with most automotive HomeLink systems; unless each vehicle was individually programmed against the base receiver (highly unlikely and time-consuming). Being that we belong to an affluent community, virtually every homeowner owns a car with a HomeLink compatible system. Many of us do not carry our fob in fear that it might be lost or stolen. Instead we program our HomeLink system to avoid the inconvenience of carrying yet one more gadget in our cars.
2) Fobs are by nature small and portable. They are easily lost and/or stolen. I believe it would be a greater security risk to issue new fobs than to just ask homeowners to program their car system (which is built into the car and thus less likely to get stolen).
3) Homeowners are more likely to give out/lend these fobs to relatives and friends then their own cars. Hence, this would defeat the “extra” security being pitched as a reason for the switch.
4) I’ve lived in the community since 2001 (phase 2) on Pesaro; extremely close to the Rinaldi gate. I, nor anyone I know in the community, have ever experienced a security breach that would justify the fob expense and inconvenience.
4) Why are we even considering fobs? We haven’t even given the new arms on Rinaldi enough time to prove themselves sufficient.
5) I believe a vocal minority is pressing for impractical security measures at the expense of the community. Why should the community be made to pay for fobs because someone’s X was able to get past the gate without authorization? A personal exception as noted should not be the responsibility of the HOA or community to prevent. Let’s face it, if someone truly wants to get in, they WILL no matter what. Let us not forget pedestrian or bicycle traffic could still sneak in behind an auto. I see several “cleaning maids” get in like this EVERY DAY; i.e. pedestrian traffic.
6) Homeowners with multiple cars will find themselves having to endure yet one more association expense (as if the current maintenance and HOA fees were not enough). For example, this would be about an additional $80 for a family of four drivers. Even more if you have more drivers. Knowing this, does it still seem probable that this is a popular decision the majority of homeowners would endorse, or just a vocal minority?
7) Expenses like this should be brought to a community vote; preferably by mail-in ballot. This would allow the majority of homeowners who cannot attend the HOA meetings, to participate and express their opinion.
Thanks for your time,"
PS. We still have a speeding problem and no enforcement of the stop signs...are we any closer to a solution? Maybe instead of having a our money wasted on the fliers and "social" activities we can focus on the pressing issues at hand. Maybe we can have a special meeting to discuss speeding/traffic alone and determine if there is a solution pleasing the entire the community. When is that officer coming (as previously mentioned)?"
What is clear is that no single answer will please everyone.
Some people absolutely hate speed humps. They feel that speed humps damage their cars are noisy and create a bad esthetic view of our neighborhood.
Some people think speed humps are the only way to solve our speeding issue. We don’t have a 7 x 24 motorcycle cop inside our community.
Some people think that speeding is the only issue the Board should spend any time on, while others are concerned about landscaping or the pool.
Many Meadows residents live on short flat streets, and don’t know what all the fuss is over since there isn’t a speeding problem up there.
We put a speed hump on Vercelli. We had two blog opportunities and several HOA meetings since the speed hump was placed. I was expecting some comment at a Board meeting, on the blog, in my e-mail, or a note to Marinel or the Security Committee about the speed hump, either positive of negative. The only comment I got was that it might be a good idea to put a sign up. We did that within a week. But so far nobody has said to us that the hump was too big or small, too noisy, too far up the hill, too far down the hill.
We do listen to all comment. I like clear concise unambiguous comments. I try not to react to anonymous snipes at me or other residents. I want to hear all sides. I know that just because I have feelings about an issue, it doesn’t mean that the 50 people who disagree with me are just wrong or stupid. It also doesn’t mean that the 50 people who agree with me are all Einsteins either. I will give everyone a chance to address the association at the meetings. I don’t like it when someone with another viewpoint is shouted down, or when one person tries to monopolize the time.
The last several meetings had between 5 and 20 residents in attendance. There is always time in the open forum for resident statements. The last few meetings have had little acrimony, and no yelling.
We can not stop all speeding. When all is said and done everyone who has a driver’s license is responsible for understanding the 25 mile per hour speed limit on residential streets and every driver knows what a full stop at a stop sign means. It is unlikely that those who speed and violate stop signs outside of our community will become polite and safe when they enter Sorrento.
We are making some changes is Security here. We have added more stop signs, and re-painted the streets in several places. You will see more signage in our community to better inform residents and visitors that we take speeding seriously.
I am not opposed to speed humps in the right places. The sense of the community seems to be to minimize the number of speed humps. We will look at each request carefully to keep within the law, and to try to make the hump effective.
As you know, there is an election this June. Four Board seats are up for election. Any candidate will be given an opportunity to address the community and have their profile and positions on our website. If you want to run on a pro-speed hump platform and win, you can influence how many speed humps we install and where and when they will be placed.
On the other hand if you choose not to run, and consider that speeding is an important issue here, but not the only issue, you can work with the Board and the Security Committee to help us reduce speeding. If you choose not to run for the Board you might want to consider joining the Security Committee. They are all people just like you that have a job, and a family and want to work to improve the quality of life here. They spend a few hours each month working together to solve speeding and other security issues.
Thanks,
Pat Pope
President"
There are many ways to contact Marinel.
• The easiest thing to do is just call her on 818-907-6622, Extension 273
• If you feel more comfortable with a written record of your issue, send Marinel an e-mail at: Marinel@rossmorganco.com
• If you want to fill out an electronic form on line the site is:
http://www.sorrentohoa.org/action-form.htm
Again, Marinel will handle the laundry concerns. Feel free to call her if you want to follow up.
Pat Pope
President"
Thank you."
We are working on some changes that will be announced in the next couple of days, that will have an impact on several aspects of our security program. The announcments will be on the website, an e-mail blast, and in the next newsletter.
Pat Pope"